Compare christianity buddhism essay

The New Testament speaks of Christ as the one Saviour for all people. [4] The First Epistle of John says that Jesus is "the propitiation for our sins and not for ours only but also for the sins of the world" ( 1 John 2:2 ). Adherents of unlimited atonement interpret this to mean that Jesus' redemptive role is for all people without exception, while adherents of limited atonement interpret it as being for all people without distinction —for Gentiles as well as Jews. The first Christians also recognized Jesus' redemptive role to be unique (without parallel), complete (as One who conveys the fullness of salvation), and definitive (beyond any possibility of being equalled, let alone surpassed, in his salvific function). In particular, his universal role means that through him the deadly forces of evil are overcome, sin is forgiven, their contamination purified, and the new existence as God's beloved, adopted children has been made available. [5] This New Testament sense of Christ's indispensable and necessary role for human salvation could be summarized by a new axiom : extra Christum nulla salus ("outside Christ no salvation"). This sense of his all-determining role in the whole redemptive drama is suggested by a fact: unlike the Old Testament , where various human beings could be called "saviour" (., Judges 3: 9 , 15 , and 31 ), the New Testament gives the title "Saviour" only to God (eight times) and to Christ (sixteen times). [5]

The group that publishes this web site is in a lose-lose situation. No matter what we write, we are severely criticized. For example, some Roman Catholics write us Emails stating that in 1054 CE , the Eastern Orthodox churches broke away from their church. Eastern Orthodox Christians also write us; they  maintain that it was the Roman Catholic church which broke away from Eastern Orthodoxy in the 11th century. If we write that the two wings of early Christianity simply drifted apart and finally split from each other, we are criticized by nearly everyone. But that seems to be what actually happened.

By the way, this point is of great practical consequence. The most dangerous thing you can do is to take any one impulse of your own nature and set it up as the thing you ought to follow at all costs. There is not one of them which will not make us into devils if we set it up as an absolute guide. You might think love of humanity in general was safe, but it is not. If you leave out justice you will find yourself breaking agreements and faking evidence in trials "for the sake of humanity," and become in the end a cruel and treacherous man.

In the same section Newman thus summarizes the battle and the triumph: such was the conflict of Christianity with the old established Paganism , which was almost dead before Christianity appeared; with the Oriental Mysteries, flitting widely to and fro like spectres; with the Gnostics , who made Knowledge all in all, despised the many, and called Catholics mere children in the Truth : with the Neo-Platonists , men of literature, pedants, visionaries, or courtiers; with the Manichees , who professed to seek truth by Reason , not by Faith ; with the fluctuating teachers of the school of Antioch , the time-serving Eusebians , and the reckless versatile Arians ; with the fanatic Montanists and harsh Novatians , who shrank from the Catholic doctrine , without power to propagate their own. These sects had no stay or consistence, yet they contained elements of truth amid their error , and had Christianity been as they, it might have resolved into them; but it had that hold of the truth which gave its teaching a gravity, a directness, a consistency, a sternness, and a force to which its rivals, for the most part, were strangers. (ibid., viii)

Compare christianity buddhism essay

compare christianity buddhism essay

In the same section Newman thus summarizes the battle and the triumph: such was the conflict of Christianity with the old established Paganism , which was almost dead before Christianity appeared; with the Oriental Mysteries, flitting widely to and fro like spectres; with the Gnostics , who made Knowledge all in all, despised the many, and called Catholics mere children in the Truth : with the Neo-Platonists , men of literature, pedants, visionaries, or courtiers; with the Manichees , who professed to seek truth by Reason , not by Faith ; with the fluctuating teachers of the school of Antioch , the time-serving Eusebians , and the reckless versatile Arians ; with the fanatic Montanists and harsh Novatians , who shrank from the Catholic doctrine , without power to propagate their own. These sects had no stay or consistence, yet they contained elements of truth amid their error , and had Christianity been as they, it might have resolved into them; but it had that hold of the truth which gave its teaching a gravity, a directness, a consistency, a sternness, and a force to which its rivals, for the most part, were strangers. (ibid., viii)

Media:

compare christianity buddhism essaycompare christianity buddhism essaycompare christianity buddhism essaycompare christianity buddhism essay